Long-term results of cervical epidural steroid injections.

Fifty-eight patients undergoing cervical epidural injection of corticosteroids were followed for a 6-month period. Patients with 90% pain relief lasting 6 months were considered to have excellent results, those with greater than 50% pain relief lasting at least 6 weeks were considered to have good results, and all others were considered to have poor results. Six months after the injection, 41.4% of patients had excellent pain relief by our criteria. Twenty-nine percent of patients reported good results and 29.3% had poor results. Those patients with the diagnosis of cervical spondylosis and those with subacute cervical strain had statistically significantly (p less than 0.001, difference of proportions test) better results than patients with other diagnoses. The procedure of cervical epidural steroid injection may be most effective in patients with cervical degenerative joint disease as the etiology of their cervical pain.

Pain control in children following tonsillectomies: a retrospective study.

Children in this documentation study were found to receive adequate analgesia that led to adequate pain control most of the time. Fewer analgesic doses were given during the night shift compared to the day and afternoon shifts. Nonanalgesic methods of pain control were consistently used for the children studied. Nurses measure pain relief in children based on verbal and behavioral indicators. The findings of this study will be presented to staff at a future unit practice council meeting. Recommendations will include: (1) administer analgesics at regular intervals throughout the hospital stay, (2) continue to consistently provide nonanalgesic methods of pain control, and (3) conduct a follow-up study using the same tool and guidelines. The results of both studies will be compared. Others who provide nursing care to children following tonsillectomies are encouraged to study the effectiveness of pain relief measures for children in their respective institutions. pain relief is a measure of quality care.

Pain and pain relief experienced by hospice patients with cancer.

The purpose of this descriptive study was to explore the pain intensity and pain relief experienced by hospice patients with cancer and the variables that might be associated with that pain. The sample consisted of 118 consenting patients and their primary caregivers receiving hospice care in their homes. Methods involved a secondary analysis of data from a study of quality of life. The Hospice Quality of Life Index (HQLI), used in the study, assesses multidimensional aspects of quality of life including pain relief. Each item is assessed on a 1 (worst) to 10 (best) scale. To eliminate pain-free patients from the analysis, an additional item asks how severe pain is when it is at its worst. Both patients and caregivers were asked to evaluate the patient's quality of life on admission and after 3 weeks of hospice care. Relationships were sought among items on the HQLI and between pain and demographic characteristics. Results revealed that most patients experience pain (82%) but that caregivers were not able to accurately estimate that pain. pain relief, even after 3 weeks of hospice care, was less than optimal, with many patients (42%) reporting pain relief at a level of 5 or less. A significant difference in pain at its worst was found by type of cancer. Although there were differences by gender, these were not significant. Pain was found to be weakly related to enjoyable activity, sleeping, fatigue, physical care, hope, and anger. Results support the idea that pain is important to overall quality of life, but despite its importance, pain in hospice patients with cancer still is not well managed.

Factort of vaso-occlusive pain in children with sickle cell disease.

PURPOSE: A descriptive, longitudinal design was used to evaluate the pain management strategies used in children with sickle cell disease who were experiencing pain during a vaso-occlusive episode. METHODS: A list of the medications (name, amount, mode of delivery, and frequency) prescribed and administered for pain management for each participant was recorded on the Medication Quantification Scale Worksheet, starting from day 1 of hospitalization to the day of discharge. Children were asked once each evening to provide three separate ratings of how much the pain medication helped them during the day, evening, and night using a 0-to-10 rating scale. RESULTS: Using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), children self-administered only 35% of the analgesic medications that were prescribed and reported little pain relief. No significant relationships were found between changes in pain relief scores and the amount of analgesics administered. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians need to monitor the amount of analgesics delivered in relationship to pain relief and assist children to titrate PCA administration of analgesics to achieve optimal pain control, or to advocate for changes in the PCA regimen when children cannot assume control of pain management.

Oral ibuprofen and diclofenac in post-operative pain: a quantitative systematic review.

Surveys show consistently that pain is not treated well. Improvement depends on knowing which treatments are the most effective. We used systematic review to compare the relative efficacy of two common analgesics, ibuprofen and diclofenac, in post-operative pain. Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE (1966 to Dec 1996), EMBASE (1980 to Jan 1997), the Cochrane Library (Aug 1996), Biological Abstracts (Jan 1985 to Dec 1996) and the Oxford pain relief Database (1950 to 1994). We sought randomised, controlled, single-dose comparisons of oral ibuprofen or diclofenac against placebo. Summed pain relief or pain intensity difference over 4-6 h was extracted and converted into dichotomous information yielding the number of patients with at least 50% pain relief. This was then used to calculate the relative benefit and the number-needed-to-treat for one patient to achieve at least 50% pain relief. Thirty-four reports compared ibuprofen and placebo (3591 patients), six compared diclofenac with placebo (840 patients), and there were two direct comparisons of diclofenac 50 mg and Ibuprofen ( Motrin ) 400 mg (130 patients). In post-operative pain, the numbers-needed-to-treat for Ibuprofen ( Motrin ) 200 mg were 3.3 (95% confidence interval 2.8-4.0) compared with placebo, for Ibuprofen ( Motrin ) 400 mg 2.7 (2.5-3.0), for Ibuprofen ( Motrin ) 600 mg 2.4 (1.9-3.3), for diclofenac 50 mg 2.3 (2.0-2.7) and for diclofenac 100 mg 1.8 (1.5-2.1). Direct comparisons of diclofenac 50 mg with Ibuprofen ( Motrin ) 400 mg showed no significant difference between the two. Both drugs worked well. Choosing between them is an issue of dose, safety and cost. Copyright 1998 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain.

Effect of repeated irradiation of low-power He-Ne laser in pain relief from postherpetic neuralgia.

In order to investigate the efficacy of repeated irradiation of low-power helium-neon laser in pain relief, we irradiated 36 outpatients suffering from postherpetic neuralgia. Each patient underwent 20 trials of irradiation on several points around the painful area at a frequency of 2 or 3 times a week. The efficacy of the laser at the end of 20 trials was noticed on 88.9%, and the degree of pain relief was 55.3%, which correlated with the number of trials. These results suggest that the irradiation of He-Ne laser is an effective and safe treatment for postherpetic neuralgia.

Factors predicting orofacial pain patient satisfaction with improvement.

AIMS: To determine psychosocial predictors of patients' ratings of satisfaction with improvement and subjective pain relief. This study also examined the underlying components of patient satisfaction with improvement, as assessed at follow-up. METHODS: The sample consisted of 107 chronic orofacial pain patients evaluated at a university-based orofacial pain clinic and referred for treatment with individualized treatment plans. Pain and psychosocial functioning were assessed with standard, reliable, validated self-report instruments administered at the initial evaluation. Follow-up data were collected via a telephone-administered structured interview 8 months after the initial evaluation. Regression methodology was used to determine prediction models for satisfaction with improvement and subjective pain relief. Patient ratings of the quality of the caregiver communication were used as a control variable in all analyses. RESULTS: Quality of caregiver communication predicted approximately 10 to 14% of the variance in outcomes in all models. Greater initial use of cognitive coping strategies and reduced depression predicted higher ratings of satisfaction with improvement and increased pain relief. When concurrent relationships among variables at the follow-up were examined, greater subjective pain relief since the evaluation, lower current pain, and higher ratings of overall mood were significant predictors of patient satisfaction with improvement. CONCLUSION: This study is one of the first to report that the use of certain cognitive coping strategies is associated with positive outcome for patients suffering from orofacial pain. These findings underscore the importance of individual differences on behavioral and psychosocial parameters in the prediction of patients' subjective evaluation of treatment outcome.

Cervical nerve root blocks: indications and role of MR imaging.

PURPOSE: To examine whether magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings of the cervical spine can predict pain relief after selective computed tomography (CT)-guided nerve root block and thus assist in the appropriate selection of patients who are suitable for this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with cervical radicular pain were examined with MR imaging and then treated with CT-guided cervical nerve root blocks (CNRBs). Various MR imaging findings were assessed and compared in terms of associated pain relief after CNRB. pain relief was graded (0%-100%) by using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The relationship between MR imaging findings and level of pain relief was tested by using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: The mean percentage of pain reduction at VAS grading was 46%. There was a significant relationship between pain relief level and both location of disk herniation (mean pain reductions of 41% at median or mediolateral locations and 64% at foraminal locations, P =.034) and location of nerve root compromise (mean pain reductions of 19% at intraspinal, 45% at foraminal entrance, and 58% at foraminal locations; P =.019). There was an inverse relationship between pain relief level and absence or presence of spinal canal stenosis (mean pain reductions of 29% when stenosis present and 53% when stenosis absent, P =.013). Other parameters were not significantly related to pain relief. CONCLUSION: MR imaging of the cervical spine assists in the appropriate selection of patients suitable for CNRB. Patients with foraminal disk herniation, foraminal nerve root compromise, and no spinal canal stenosis appear to have the greatest pain relief after this procedure. Copyright RSNA, 2004

Long-term follow-up study of rostral mesencephalic reticulotomy for pain relief--report of 34 cases.

A long-term follow-up study of rostral mesencephalic reticulotomy (RMR) for pain relief is presented. 34 patients (24 males and 10 females) were operated. Ages ranged from 18 to 65 years. The follow-up period was 1-70 months. The overall effectiveness of RMR showed good relief of pain in 23 patients (67%). The study of effectiveness of RMR according to type of pain showed good relief of pain in 5 out of 6 patients (83%) with nondenervation pain, whereas satisfactory pain relief was obtained in 18 out of 28 patients (64%) with denervation pain.

Near-total pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis.

Eighty-seven patients underwent distal subtotal or near-total (80% to 95%) pancreatectomy (NTP) during a 25-year period for management of intractable pain resulting from chronic pancreatitis. Alcoholism affected the majority of patients and 20% of cases were idiopathic in origin. Ten patients (12%) exhibited insulin-requiring diabetes before operation. The perioperative mortality rate was 3.4%. Significant improvement or complete pain relief was achieved in 75% of patients while 14% remained narcotic dependent. Forty-four patients (51%) required insulin postoperatively, with an average insulin requirement of 35 U per day. Thirty late deaths occurred 2 to 15 years after operation, 12 (40%) of which were related to complications of pancreatic insufficiency or persistent alcoholism. Five patients (8.5%) required completion pancreatectomy 6 months to 4 years after NTP for complications relating to persistent pancreatitis. NTP provides effective pain relief in the majority of patients with chronic pancreatitis. While this procedure can be performed with a low operative mortality rate, the high incidence of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency after operation may contribute to late deaths. Consequently, this procedure should be performed only when the underlying disease has functionally destroyed the pancreas or when lesser procedures have failed to provide adequate pain relief.