|
Postoperative pain relief by preanesthetic administration of buprenorphine suppository in elective mastectomy
Seventy female patients scheduled for elective mastectomy were divided into three groups: Buprenorphine suppository (BPS) 0.4 mg group (n = 29); BPS 0.2 mg (n = 23) group; and control (scopolia extract and tannic acid suppository) group (n = 18). Suppositories were administered rectally to patients of each group one hour before induction of anesthesia. Plasma buprenorphine concentrations, sedation scores at entering the operating room, postoperative pain scores and side effects were evaluated. There were no significant differences in sedation effects of suppository among the three groups. Although there were significant differences in pain scores except at the time when patients left the operating room between BPS 0.2 mg group and the control group, postoperative pain relief in BPS 0.2 mg group was judged not enough. However, postoperative pain relief was more satisfactory in the BPS 0.4 mg group. Plasma concentrations of the BPS 0.4 mg group were higher than those of the BPS 0.2 mg group. Although nausea and vomiting were observed in 5 patients (17.2%) of the BPS 0.4 mg group and 4 patients (17.4%) of the BPS 0.2 mg group, respiratory depression and changes in blood pressure and heart rate were not observed in all groups. In conclusion, preanesthetic administration of the BPS 0.4 mg seemed to be useful for postoperative pain relief after elective mastectomy.
Near-total pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis.
Eighty-seven patients underwent distal subtotal or near-total (80% to 95%) pancreatectomy (NTP) during a 25-year period for management of intractable pain resulting from chronic pancreatitis. Alcoholism affected the majority of patients and 20% of cases were idiopathic in origin. Ten patients (12%) exhibited insulin-requiring diabetes before operation. The perioperative mortality rate was 3.4%. Significant improvement or complete pain relief was achieved in 75% of patients while 14% remained narcotic dependent. Forty-four patients (51%) required insulin postoperatively, with an average insulin requirement of 35 U per day. Thirty late deaths occurred 2 to 15 years after operation, 12 (40%) of which were related to complications of pancreatic insufficiency or persistent alcoholism. Five patients (8.5%) required completion pancreatectomy 6 months to 4 years after NTP for complications relating to persistent pancreatitis. NTP provides effective pain relief in the majority of patients with chronic pancreatitis. While this procedure can be performed with a low operative mortality rate, the high incidence of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency after operation may contribute to late deaths. Consequently, this procedure should be performed only when the underlying disease has functionally destroyed the pancreas or when lesser procedures have failed to provide adequate pain relief.
pain relief in infants after major surgery: a descriptive study.
Twenty subjects (nurses or parents) were interviewed concerning postoperative pain and pain relief in infants. Details of postoperative analgesics given were obtained from hospital records of 32 infants, aged 0 to 12 months, who had undergone major surgery, and routines for postoperative pain relief in infants were investigated at four Swedish hospitals where major surgery is performed on infants. Although both nurses and parents were found to be able to recognize postoperative pain reactions in infants, attitudes to pain relief were not uniform. In principle, postoperative pain relief is given "as required," although both dosage and intervals between doses are arbitrary.
Intraventricular morphine produces pain relief, hypothermia, hyperglycaemia and increased prolactin and growth hormone levels in patients with cancer pain.
The effects of analgesic, thermoregulatory and endocrine functions of administering morphine sulphate (0.3 mg) into the lateral cerebral ventricle via an Ommaya catheter were assessed in eight patients with cancer pain. Satisfactory control of intractable pain was obtained in these patients, without any change in other sensory modalities. The delay in the onset of pain relief and the duration of analgesia ranged, respectively, from 20 to 40 min and from 12 to 16 h after drug injection. In addition, intraventricular administration of morphine caused a reduction in rectal temperature in these patients at an ambient temperature of 24 degrees C. The hypothermia in response to the injection of morphine was due to cutaneous vasodilation and sweating. There was no change in metabolism or in respiratory evaporative heat loss after morphine injection. Further, 10 to 20 min after intraventricular administration of morphine, the blood levels of prolactin, growth hormone and glucose were elevated in these patients. The changes in temperature and endocrine levels lasted for 1-3 h. In addition to the pain relief, these side-effects of morphine treatment were short-lasting and disappeared as the morphine treatment continued. The results indicate that activation of opiate receptors in the brain produced pain relief, hypothermia (due to cutaneous vasodilation and sweating), and increased blood levels of prolactin, growth hormone and glucose in patients with cancer pain.
Treatment of lumbar facet joint syndrome by CT-guided infiltration of the intervertebral joints
INTRODUCTION: Lumbar facet joint syndrome is a common condition, involving about 79% of patients suffering from low back pain. Denervation by scalpel or electrofrequency is a well-known method of treating it. An alternative method for longer lasting pain relief is CT-guided intraarticular infiltration of facet joints with local anaesthetics and cortisone. METHODS: In 62 patients with facet syndrome a total of 205 joints were infiltrated, CT monitoring being used in all cases. Each facet joint was infiltrated with 0.3 ml bupivacaine and 0.8 ml methylprednisolone. The patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 consisted of 24 persons who had undergone lumbar disc surgery, group 2 of 23 patients with spondylarthrosis of the facet joints, and group 3 of 15 patients who had undergone lumbar disc surgery but had additional spondylarthrosis. Very good results were defined as pain relief for longer than 4 weeks, good results as pain relief for up to 4 weeks and poor results as brief pain relief or none at all. In 27 patients facet infiltration was performed for the purpose of diagnosis. RESULTS: Results were significantly in group 2 than in group 1 (Fisher's exact test P < 0.012). In group 3 results were better than in group 1, but worse than in group 2. These differences were not statistical by significant (Table 3). Seven patients in the diagnostic group had no pain relief, and facet syndrome was excluded. CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided facet joint infiltration is a good method for treatment and diagnosis of lumbar facet joint syndrome. It can be repeated and has no severe side effects. The best results were seen in patients with spondylarthrosis of the facet joints. After lumbar disc surgery the pain relief was shorter, though it also yielded good results. For patients with unspecific low back pain, facet joint injections are a very good diagnostic method, allowing definite exclusion of lumbar facet syndrome.
Topical radiotherapy in the management of skeletal metastases
Local radiotherapy plays an important role in the palliative management of bone metastases. Different concepts of dose fractionation are in use. A judgement of the efficacy of these concepts should be based on their different palliative treatment endopoints. The efficacy of radiotherapy using published data can be analysed with respect to pain relief and re-establishment of bone integrity as treatment endopoints. Trials stratifying radiooncological techniques according to an optimization of quality of life are missing. Nevertheless, the rationale for individual treatment in daily work is based on systemic tumor extent, life expectancy, the kind of symptoms and the location of the metastasis in question. In patients with reduced live expectancy a remarkably high chance of pain relief (70%) could be achieved with single doses of 8 Gy. The latency period until pain relief is shorter with higher single doses. In case of recurrence of pain reirradiation with a single dose results in an equally high response rate. Patients with a solitary metastasis, patients with longer live expectancy and patients with pathological fractures should be treated with 'curative' doses, aimed to cause maximum tumor cell killing. Impaired bone stability in patients who are not suitable for surgical intervention requires orthetic supply. Apart from the effect of pain relief, remineralization is the important treatment goal for these patients. Conventional radiotherapy with doses of 40-50 Gy resulted in remineralization in 60-80% of the patients 4-8 weeks after irradiation. Remineralization could not be acceierated by short course fractionation courses.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: quantitative prospective evaluation of long-term outcomes.
PURPOSE: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures may cause debilitating pain that lasts for weeks or months, and which is often neither quickly nor completely relieved by conventional conservative therapy. Previous retrospective studies have suggested significant and nearly immediate pain relief, as well as rapid and sustained functional recovery, after percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty (PPV). This prospective, quantitative study with long-term follow-up was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PPV as a new treatment for patients with osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures of the lumbar and thoracic spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PPV was performed in 30 patients with 54 symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures who had a less-than-satisfactory response to conventional therapy. All procedures were performed by a single operator with significant experience in performing PPV. The Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management Scale (MODEMS) spinal intervention questionnaire, which includes the SF-36, was administered to all patients before intervention and exactly 2 weeks after the final PPV procedure. Pain and disability, treatment expectations and satisfaction, mental function, and quality of life were evaluated by four specialized modules, and responses to questionnaires preceding treatment were compared to those obtained at follow-up. Results of a long-term follow-up questionnaire were collected 15-18 months after the final vertebroplasty treatment. RESULTS: Our population consisted of three men and 27 women, with a mean age of 79 years. Fifty-four PPV procedures were performed for compression fractures in these 30 patients. Significant postprocedural improvement in all four MODEMS modules was demonstrated at 2 weeks (treatment score, P <.0001; pain and disability, P <.0001; physical function, P =.0004; and mental function, P =.0009). A small epidural leak of polymethylmethacrylate in one patient was asymptomatic and did not require intervention. At long-term follow-up (15-18 mo), 22 of 23 patients responding remained satisfied with the outcome of therapy and believed that the procedure had provided durable pain relief. Verbal pain scores documented significantly diminished back pain at 2 weeks (P <.0001) and again at long-term follow-up when compared to baseline (P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PPV is a safe and efficacious procedure for the relief of pain and disability after osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Patient satisfaction is high and persists when compared to preprocedural expectations; durable pain relief is provided.
Continuous epidural analgesia for painless labor does not increase the incidence of cesarean delivery.
BACKGROUND: Continuous epidural analgesia is a popular technique provided for labor pain relief. However, the possible association between epidural analgesia and increased rate of cesarean delivery is always a concern. The purpose of this study was to explore if epidural analgesia would affect the rate of cesarean delivery in healthy term parturient women. METHODS: A retrospective review of obstetric records of 822 parturients was done to compute the proportions and odds ratio of cesarean delivery between parturients receiving epidural analgesia for labor pain relief and those not receiving. RESULTS: Results indicated that the overall proportion of cesarean delivery was 11.1% in the epidural group as against 16.2% in the control group and the odds ratio was 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.37 to 1.08). The difference between groups was not statistically significant. However, for nulliparous women alone, the proportions of cesarean delivery were 11.6% and 25.1% in exposure group and control group respectively. The odds ratio was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.20 to 0.71). This difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The findings may support the conclusion that continuous epidural analgesia for pain relief during labor would not increase the rate of cesarean delivery. In contrast, it may reduce this risk in nulliparas.
Changes in voluntary muscle strength, somatosensory transmission and skin temperature concomitant with pain relief during autotraction in patients with lumbar and sacral root lesions.
Earlier clinical observations of rapid changes of certain neurological dysfunctions after autotraction treatment of patients with lumbar and sacral root affections have been evaluated by objective registration methods. Isokinetic recordings of maximal voluntary strength showed that in 6 out of 8 patients, weakness of the foot dorsal flexor muscles could be more or less completely restored after one session of autotraction resulting in pain relief. In a group of patients with clinical signs of impaired sensibility, the low or abolished SEP responses to nerve stimulation on the affected side were restituted in 4 out of 5 cases during autotraction. The asymmetric leg skin temperatures in 10 patients with sciatic pain levelled off in the 6 cases obtaining pain relief by the traction. The results suggest a causal relationship between pain relief and restitution of certain neurological deficits.
Intercostal nerve block, interpleural analgesia, thoracic epidural block or systemic opioid application for pain relief after thoracotomy?
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different pain-relief methods (regional and systemic) following thoracotomies on the cardiovascular system, pulmonary gas exchange, various endocrine parameters and subjective perception. A further aspect was to evaluate the benefits of interpleural analgesia as a new regional technique against already established regional techniques, such as intercostal nerve block and thoracic epidural block. All postoperative pain methods led to a significant time-dependent reduction of the adrenaline concentrations in plasma while the noradrenaline concentrations did not change significantly. There were no statistical differences in catecholamine concentrations among the different study groups, although the mean concentrations of adrenaline in patients having a thoracic epidural block for pain relief were lower in comparison to the findings in other groups. The plasma concentrations of the "stress metabolites", such as glucose, free fatty acids and lactate, as well as the haemodynamic (mean arterial pressure, heart rate) and pulmonary parameters (blood gas analyses), showed no significant differences among groups. In contrast to the other pain-relieving methods, interpleural analgesia did not lead to sufficient pain relief in that 7 out of 10 patients needed supplementary systemic opioid therapy. Therefore, interpleural analgesia for pain relief following thoracotomies cannot be recommended.
|