The pituitary as a target of antalgic treatment of chronic cancer pain: a possible mechanism of pain relief through pituitary neuroadenolysis.

Surgical hypophysectomy performed in 18 cases with hormone-dependent carcinoma resulted in tumour regression in 38.8% of the cases, and pain relief in 88%. Neuroadenolysis performed 170 times on 130 cases resulted in pain relief in 94% with hormone-dependent carcinoma, and 70% with non-dependent carcinoma. The clinical investigations, following performance of neuroadenolysis, indicate suppressed pituitary function, significant increase of ACTH, thyrotropin-releasing hormone and vasopressin in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), delay of long latencies in somatosensory evoked potential and increased pain threshold of C-fibres. Increase of beta-endorphin in CSF was very brief. Though the exact physiological activity in pain sensation of those peptides other than endorphins still remains obscure, increase of the peptides which are mainly synthesized in the hypothalamopituitary axis, along with suppressed pituitary function, is considered to exert a long-lasting suppressive effect on the mediation and perception of cancer pain through C-fibres and the central nervous system.

Percutaneous alcoholization of the celiac plexus under echographic guidance: an alternative to splanchnicectomy? Study of 21 cases

Celiac plexus block is usually performed under fluoroscopic or tomodensitometric guidance. We report on a new procedure using sonographic guidance. The patient lies in supine position. We use a real-time sonograph (Kontron Sigma 1 AC) with a 3.5 MHz probe. On a transverse plane, the celiac axis is localized emerging from aorta. After local anesthesia, the tip of the spinal needle (177 mm, 22 G) is placed close to aorta (about 5 mm) on both sides. 10 to 15 ml of 1 per cent lidocaine then 10 to 15 ml of absolute alcohol are injected on each side. 21 patients (10 males, 11 females, mean age: 61) underwent the procedure. They presented with cancer of the pancreas in 14 cases, metastatic nodes in 3 cases, cholangiocarcinoma in 2 cases and chronic calcifying pancreatitis (CCP) in 2 cases. No pain relief occurred in 3 patients (14 per cent). On of those presented with CCP but the endoscopic cystic diversion of a small cyst was successful to eradicate pain. Partial pain relief occurred in 5 cases (24 per cent). Total pain relief was obtained in 13 cases (62 per cent). No complication related to the treatment was observed. Sonography is a simple and safe method of guidance to perform alcohol block of the celiac plexus. The anterior approach may prevent neurologic complications related to other methods of guidance.

Radiation therapy for metastatic spinal tumors.

PURPOSE: The results of radiation therapy for metastatic spinal tumors were evaluated in terms of pain relief, improvement of neurological impairment, and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1986 and 1995, 52 symptomatic patients with metastatic spinal tumors treated with radiation therapy were evaluated. The patients all received irradiation of megavoltage energy. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in terms of pain relief and improvement of neurological impairment. RESULTS: pain relief was observed in 29 (61.7%) of 47 patients with pain. Therapy was effective for 17 (70.8%) of 24 patients without neurological impairment, and efficacy was detected in 12 (52.2%) of 23 patients with neurological impairment. Improvement of neurological symptoms was obtained in seven (25.0%) of 28 patients with neurological impairment. CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy was effective for pain relief in patients with metastatic spinal tumors. In patients with neurological impairment, less pain relief was observed than in those without impairment. Improvement of neurological impairment was restricted, but radiation therapy was thought to be effective in some cases in the early stage of neurological deterioration. Radiation therapy for metastatic spinal tumors contraindicated for surgery was considered effective for improvement of patients' activities of daily living.

Personality traits in the mechanisms of interferential therapy for osteoarthritic knee pain.

The role of hypochondriacal, depressive, and hysterical personality traits in response to interferential therapy (IFT) was studied in 50 patients with chronic knee osteoarthrosis. Personality traits were assessed through the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Each patient received ten sessions of IFT during two weeks. pain relief was assessed subjectively (with a numerical pain-relief scale) at the end of treatment and one week later in a single-blind method. Patients who experienced pain relief of 50% or more were considered responders (n = 22). Those who experienced pain relief of 25% or less were considered nonresponders (n = 24). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups on any of the personality traits studied. These personality traits apparently have no effect on the response of osteoarthritic knee pain to IFT.

Percutaneous controlled radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: 25-year experience with 1,600 patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous, controlled radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy (RF-TR). The outcome of 1,600 patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia after RF-TR was analyzed after a follow-up period of 1 to 25 years. METHODS: A total of 1,600 patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia underwent 2,138 percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy procedures between 1974 and 1999. Sixty-seven patients had bilateral idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia, and 36 of them were treated with bilateral RF-TR; 1,216 patients (76%) were successfully managed with a single procedure, and the remainder were treated with multiple procedures. Benzodiazepines and narcotic analgesics were used for anesthesia because patient cooperation during the procedures was essential so that the physician could create selective, controlled lesions. RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 68.1 +/- 66.4 months (range, 12-300 mo). Acute pain relief was accomplished in 97.6% of patients. Complete pain relief was achieved at 5 years in 57.7% of the patients who underwent a single procedure. pain relief was reported in 92% of patients with a single procedure or with multiple procedures 5 years after the first rhizotomy was performed. At 10-year follow-up, 52.3% of the patients who underwent a single procedure and 94.2% of the patients who underwent multiple procedures had experienced pain relief; at 20-year follow-up, 41 and 100% of these patients, respectively, had experienced pain relief. No mortalities occurred. After the first procedure was performed, early pain recurrence (<6 mo) was observed in 123 patients (7.7%) and late pain recurrence was observed in 278 patients (17.4%). Complications included diminished corneal reflex in 91 patients (5.7%), masseter weakness and paralysis in 66 (4.1%), dysesthesia in 16 (1 %), anesthesia dolorosa in 12 (0.8%), keratitis in 10 (0.6%), and transient paralysis of Cranial Nerves III and VI in 12 (0.8%). Permanent Cranial Nerve VI palsy was observed in two patients, cerebrospinal fluid leakage in two, carotid-cavernous fistula in one, and aseptic meningitis in one. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous, controlled RF-TR represents a minimally invasive, low-risk technique with a high rate of efficacy. The procedure may safely be repeated if pain recurs.

Postoperative titration of intravenous morphine in the elderly patient.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous morphine titration is used to obtain rapid and complete postoperative pain relief. Whether this titration can be safely administered in the elderly patients remains a matter for debate. METHODS: Intravenous morphine titration was administered as a bolus of 2 (body weight < or = 60 kg) or 3 (body weight > 60 kg) mg. The interval between each bolus was 5 min. There was no limitation in the number of boluses given until pain relief or severe adverse effect occurred. The visual analog scale threshold required to administer morphine was 30 mm, and pain relief was defined as a visual analog scale score of 30 mm or less. Patients were divided into two groups: young and elderly (age > or = 70 yr) patients. Data were expressed as mean +/- SD. RESULTS: Eight hundred seventy-five patients (83%) were young and 175 patients (17%) were elderly. At the end of morphine titration, the visual analog scale score and the number of patients with pain relief were not significantly different between groups. The total dose of morphine per kilograms of body weight administered was not significantly different between groups (0.15 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.09 mg/kg, not significant). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of morphine-related adverse effects (13 vs. 14%, not significant), the number of sedated patients (60 vs. 60%, not significant), and the number of patients whose titration had to be stopped (2 vs. 2%, not significant). CONCLUSION: Intravenous morphine titration can be safely administered to elderly patients. Because titration is adapted to individual pain, the same protocol can be applied to young and elderly patients.

What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain?

Despite widespread use of the 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain intensity, relatively little is known about the meaning of decreases in pain intensity assessed by means of this scale to patients. We aimed to establish the meaning to patients of declines in pain intensity and percent pain reduction. Upon arrival to the postanesthesia care unit, postsurgical patients rated their baseline pain intensity on both a 0-10 NRS and on a 4-point verbal scale. Patients whose NRS was higher than 4/10 received intravenous opioids until their pain intensity declined to 4/10 or lower. During opioid titration, patients were asked every 10 min to rate pain intensity on a NRS and to indicate the degree of pain improvement on a 5-point Likert scale from 'no improvement' to 'complete pain relief'. Seven hundred adult patients were enrolled. For patients with moderate pain, a decrease of 1.3 units (20% reduction) corresponded to 'minimal' improvement, a decrease of 2.4 (35% reduction) to 'much' improvement, a decrease of 3.5 units (45% reduction) corresponded to 'very much' improvement. For patients with severe pain, the decrease in NRS pain score and the percentage of pain relief had to be larger to obtain similar degrees of pain relief. The change in pain intensity that is meaningful to patients increases as the severity of their baseline pain increases. The present findings are applicable in the clinical setting and research arena to assess treatment efficacy.

An integrated pain relief service for labour: co-operation between obstetricians, anaesthetists and midwives.

Epidural injections were performed by obstetricians on 1012 patients in a pain relief service in which there was clinical co-operation between anaesthetists and obstetricians. A consultant anaesthetist collaborated in the training of staff providing the service. Midwives maintained the epidural analgesia with top-up doses as part of their traditional role in providing pain relief in labour. Eight-eight per cent of patients were fully satisfied, 10% were helped and 2% had failed epidurals. The forceps rate was 30% and the dural tap rate 1.4%. Junior obstetric staff in training grades can with adequate safeguards make a significant contribution to running an obstetric epidural service.

Perceptions of pain and pain relief in labour: the gulf between experience and observation.

In a national sample of 10,702 women delivered in one week in 1990 data on their perceptions of pain and the effectiveness of pain relief methods were compared with those of the professionals attending them. Professionals' conceptions of pain relief tended to be restricted to pharmacological methods. Overall, the level of agreement about effectiveness of pain relief was quite low, with medical staff commonly believing they were providing adequate pain relief while the women reported it as unsatisfactory. This was particularly the case for pethidine, while 'Entonox' was rated more highly by women than staff. Professionals were significantly more likely to agree with one another about effectiveness than to agree with the women, and were less likely to have responded where the women judged their pain relief as poor.

Localization of specific joint causing hindfoot pain: value of injecting local anesthetics into individual joints during arthrography.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of selective injection of local anesthetic into hindfoot articulations for localizing the source of posttraumatic pain and to compare clinical response with the severity of degenerative change in the various articulations evident on plain radiographs or CT scans. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Anesthetic arthrography was performed in 18 patients with posttraumatic hindfoot pain. In all, 32 joints were assessed: 15 talocalcaneonavicular, 11 subtalar, five ankle, and one calcaneocuboid. Following intraarticular injection of a mixture of equal amounts of meglumine diatrizoate 60%, lidocaine 1%, and bupivacaine 0.25%, patients were asked to grade the degree of pain relief they experienced on a scale from 0% to 100%. The degree of degenerative changes seen on preliminary radiographs and CT scans was graded blindly and retrospectively by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist using a 3-point scale (grade 0 indicated a normal joint, grade 1 indicated mild to moderate degenerative change, and grade 2 indicated severe degenerative change). The value of findings on both routine radiographs and CT scans as predictors of the degree of symptomatic relief obtained from specific joint injections was determined. Arthrodesis was performed in nine patients on the basis of the results of anesthetic injections. RESULTS. The degree of pain relief experienced after intraarticular injection of anesthetic correlated with the severity of degenerative change as assessed by routine radiography in 15 of 32 joints and as assessed by CT in eight of 18 joints. In 14 of 32 joints assessed by routine radiography and in seven of 18 joints assessed by CT, the amount of pain relief achieved by anesthetic arthrography was less than that predicted by imaging evidence of degenerative disease. In five of 32 joints judged normal on plain film radiographs, significant pain relief was experienced following anesthetic injection, resulting in a change in the proposed surgical procedure. Long-term follow-up indicated satisfactory results in eight of the nine patients in whom arthrodesis was performed. CONCLUSION. Selective intraarticular anesthetic injections afford a direct method of confirming the site of hindfoot pain and may aid in surgical planning, because plain film radiography or CT may underestimate or poorly indicate the most symptomatic articulations.