Pain Information
Pain Management
Relief by Medication
Pain Medications
 
Non-RX Medicine
Eazol
Ibuprofen / Motrin
Naprosyn (Naproxen)
Tramaden
 
Prescription Medicine
Allopurinol
Butalbital
Colchicine
Esgic Plus
Fioricet (Butalbital)
Flextra
Imitrex
Tramadol
Ultram (Tramadol)
Zyloprim (Allopurinol)
 

Continuous intracisternal and high cervical intrathecal bupivacaine analgesia in refractory head and neck pain.

BACKGROUND: The upper cervical component of the spinomesencephalic tract and cranial nerves V, VII (nervus intermedius), IX, and X are involved in mechanisms of acute and chronic pain from head and neck structures. To date there is no reliable method for relief of refractory pain (i.e., pain that cannot be relieved by conventional pharmacologic therapies) from these structures. Therefore, we explored continuous intracisternal infusion of bupivacaine for the treatment of refractory pain of the head and neck. METHODS: Intracisternal catheters were inserted in 13 adults with refractory nonmalignant (n = 4) and malignant (n = 9) pain from the head, face, mouth, neck, and upper extremities; 0.5% plain bupivacaine was infused continuously at rates of 1-7 (median 1.5) mg/h with optional bolus doses of 0.5-2.0 mg 4-2 times/h. The efficacy was assessed from pain relief (daily VAS(max), VAS(min), and VAS(mean) scores 0-10), daily doses of intracisternal bupivacaine and total opioid (expressed as mg parenteral morphine-eq), amount of nocturnal sleep, and rates of adverse effects. RESULTS: The 13 patients were treated for 3-182 days (median 37, total 712 days), 3 patients being treated at home for 10-112 days (median 88, total 210 days). In one patient, the efficacy of the treatment could not be estimated because of advanced senility. Eleven of the remaining 12 patients obtained acceptable pain relief with daily doses of intracisternal bupivacaine ranging from 20 to 118 mg (median 37 mg): VAS(mean) scores decreased from 7 to 2, mean pain relief increased for 30% to 80%, total opioid daily dose decreased from 53 to 36 mg parenteral morphine-eq, and nocturnal sleep increased from 2 to >6h (all figures are median values). Speech, eating, walking, and natural functions were generally not affected. Side effects such as tiredness and malaise, somnolence and sleep, feeling of coldness in the neck and skull base, transient post-spinal puncture headache, paresthesias, hoarseness, dysphagia, transient paresis of the upper/lower extremities, episodic miosis and conjunctival hyperemia, and transient orthostatic arterial hypotension were each observed in one or two patients. No patient presented clinical evidence of phrenic nerve paralysis. There was no nausea or vomiting. No persistent neurologic deficit or death could be attributed to the intracisternal pain treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous intracisternal infusion of bupivacaine may be a useful method in exceptional, well selected patients with refractory pain from the head and neck structures. Further studies are necessary to establish the indications and the safety of the method.

The role of percutaneous cordotomy in the treatment of chronic cancer pain.

The authors report on 53 cervical percutaneous cordotomies in 52 patients suffering from chronic unilateral cancer pain. The evaluation of the results is based upon the patient's report of complete pain relief. Immediate and long term pain relief as well as complications and mortality rate are analysed. Excellent surgical results were obtained in 73% after one week and in 63% 15 weeks after operation. The topographical distribution of pain seems to influence the pain relief; the location of the cancer does influence the nature of the complications. Furthermore, the occurrence of other pain syndromes, controlateral to or above the level of analgesia, is evaluated. This appears to be an important limitation of the usefulness of cordotomy.

Naloxone does not affect pain relief induced by electrical stimulation in man.

We wished to determine if pain relief that resulted from transcutaneous (TNS) or spinal cord electrical stimulation in patients with chronic pain was due to activation of an endogenous opiate-related pain control system. Naloxone (0.4-10 mg) or saline was injected in double-blind fashion intravenously into opiate-naive subjects with chronic pain who achieved 30% or greater pain relief with spinal cord stimulation (4 patients) or TNS (9 patients). Subjects rated their pain during stimulation and 2, 5, 10 and 15 min after the injection. Two days or more later the procedure was repeated using the alternate agent (naloxone or saline). Naloxone did not decrease the pain relief induced by stimulation, and therefore the effects of stimulation are probably not mediated by the endogenous opiates.

"Why haven't you taken any pain killers?" A patient focused study of the walking wounded in an urban emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess the proportion of patients of triage category 3-5 presenting to the minor side of an urban emergency department who present without taking prior pain relief, and (2) to describe the reasons why they do not take pain relief for their presenting complaint METHOD: By patient interview of a convenience sample of 60 adult patients in the setting of an urban emergency department. RESULTS: Fifteen of 60 patients had taken analgesia and 45 of 60 (75%) had not. Sixteen reasons were volunteered to the interviewer. Most patients offered one reason only 39 of 45 (87%). The three commonest single reasons cited for not taking pain relief were "don't like taking tablets" 10 (22%), "run out of tablets" 10 (22%), five (11%) said their "pain not bad enough". Six (13%) patients cited two reasons for not taking pain relief. Only three (6%) patients indicated that they "did not think about pain relief". Six (13%) of patients had inappropriate perceptions of how pain killers may interfere with their care. CONCLUSION: Most patients presenting with painful conditions to the minor side of an urban emergency department had not taken pain relief. The study highlights there are many different reasons for this and staff should not presume that it was because the patient "did not think about it". Ongoing education of staff and patients is needed.

Intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain relief after transvaginal hysterectomy

We studied the effect of a low-dose intrathecal morphine (0.1 or 0.2 mg) in postoperative pain relief and the incidence of side effects. Two hundred and fifteen patients scheduled for transvaginal hysterectomy were divided into 3 groups according to intrathecal morphine doses: M1 (morphine 0.1 mg N = 75), M2 (morphine 0.2 mg N = 69) and C (control N = 71). A standard mid-line lumbar puncture was performed using a 25-gauze needle in the L3/4 interspace. Preservative-free morphine hydrochloride mixed in hyperbaric tetracaine solution was administered intrathecally. pain relief was significantly greater for the first 24 hrs in groups M1 and M2 compared with group C. Respiratory depression was not seen in any groups. The incidence of vomiting was about 40% in all groups. We conclude that intrathecal morphine 0.1-0.2 mg is useful for pain relief after transvaginal hysterectomy and accompanies no major side effects.

Postoperative pain therapy: a survey of patients' expectations and their experiences.

For 2 months elective surgical patients (n = 259) were asked preoperatively about their expectations of pain and pain relief. At both 24 and 72 h after their surgery they were asked about their pain and pain control. The analgesics they received were monitored for the first 72 h. The survey revealed that patients do not have the necessary knowledge about pain relief to contribute effectively in their own pain management. Analgesics administered intermittently were generally effective when given, however, the dosing interval was too long for the agents used resulting in frequent reports of poor pain relief. We conclude that patients need better education on postoperative pain control therapy. Medical staff could prescribe, and nursing staff administer, analgesics more effectively.

Superior hypogastric plexus block for chronic pelvic pain in the presence of endometriosis: CT techniques and results.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of superior hypogastric plexus block with computed tomographic (CT) guidance in patients with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven blocks were performed on an outpatient basis in five women with endometriosis and pelvic pain. In the first four patients, one or two 20-gauge, 15-cm needles were placed anterior to the spine at the common iliac bifurcation from a posterior approach. In the fifth patient, the block was performed from an anterior approach with a single needle. RESULTS: One procedure resulted in mild pain relief, three in considerable pain relief, one in complete midline pain relief with no change in the lateral pain, and one in complete pain relief. One procedure was terminated because anesthetic was injected into the peritoneal cavity. There were no other complications. CONCLUSION: CT-guided superior hypogastric plexus block is easily performed and can be used to assess whether chronic pelvic pain can be attenuated by blocking the superior hypogastric plexus.

Intravenous infusion of fosphenytoin produces prolonged pain relief: a case report.

The objective of this case report is to emphasize the analgesic effect of antiepileptic drugs in those with neuropathic pain, confirm that fosphenytoin possesses these analgesic properties, and to highlight that intravenous administration of fosphenytoin for 24 hours can produce good quality pain relief that lasts for many weeks. A 37-year-old woman with a neuroma (caused by surgical intervention for an endometrial sarcoma) producing neuropathic pain unresponsive to opiates was successfully treated with intravenous infusion of 1,500 phenytoin equivalent units fosphenytoin for 24 hours. The pain relief after this and subsequent infusions persisted for between 3 and 14 weeks and was associated with a reduced opiate requirement and an increase in activities of daily living. Fosphenytoin infusion can give good quality pain relief in the patient with neuropathic pain.

The effect of patient age, gender, and tibial component fixation on pain relief after cementless total knee arthroplasty.

Cementless total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were prospectively evaluated for pain relief in 1110 knees. The effect of screws in the tibial component, the age of the patients, and the gender of the patients were studied to determine the effect of these parameters on pain relief one and two years postsurgery. The group with screws in the tibial component (Ortholoc II) had a significantly higher percentage of pain-free knees at one year than at two years postsurgery, and the older patients had a significantly higher rate of pain-free knees at one- and two years postsurgery than the younger patients. Older female patients with Ortholoc I TKAs had a significantly higher percentage of pain-free knees than did older male patients at one-year postsurgery, but not at two years. The group with screws in the tibial components (Ortholoc II) had a higher percentage of pain-free knees at one-year postsurgery than did the Ortholoc I knees, but there was no difference between Ortholoc I and II at two-years postsurgery. In the Ortholoc II group, there was also no difference in results among sexes or between patients older and younger than 65 years old. The correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the relationship between body weight and the degree of pain after TKA. No significant correlation could be found at one and two years after surgery.

Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain in peripheral neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used for the relief of chronic, intractable pain for over 2 decades. Recent technologic improvements in hardware have resulted in improved clinical outcome. We report our experience with epidural spinal cord stimulation for pain control of peripheral neuropathy for the past 15 years. METHODS: An analysis of our series of 276 patients revealed 30 patients diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy. The mean age of the 16 men and 14 women in the study was 62.4 years. The anatomic sources of pain included thorax, as well as upper and lower limbs. Causes of intractable pain included postherpetic neuralgia, intercostal neuralgia, causalgic pain, diabetic neuropathy, and idiopathic neuropathy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients reported relief of pain on trial stimulation and had their systems permanently implanted. At an average of 87 months' follow-up, 14 of these patients achieved long-term success in control of chronic pain (47% of all patients included in this study). Six patients reported excellent pain relief (> 75% pain relief), eight described good results (> 50% pain relief), and six had poor pain relief (< 50% pain relief). CONCLUSION: SCS is an effective therapy for pain syndromes associated with peripheral neuropathy. Causalgic and diabetic neuropathic pain seem to respond relatively well. whereas postherpetic pain and intercostal neuralgia syndromes seem to respond less favorably to the long-term beneficial effects of SCS. This information will be useful in the selection of patients with peripheral neuropathic pain who could be helped by SCS.

 

pain relief 1 | pain relief 2 | pain relief 3 | pain relief 4 | pain relief 5 | pain relief 6 | pain relief 7 | pain relief 8 | pain relief 9 | pain relief 10 | pain relief 11 | pain relief 12 | pain relief 13 | pain relief 14 | pain relief 15 | pain relief 16 | pain relief 17 | pain relief 18 | pain relief 19 | pain relief 20 | pain relief 21 | pain relief 22 | pain relief 23 | pain relief 24 | pain relief 25 | pain relief 26 | pain relief 27 | pain relief 28 | pain relief 29 | pain relief 30 | pain relief 31 | pain relief 32 | pain relief 33 | pain relief 34 | pain relief 35 | pain relief 36 | pain relief 37 | pain relief 38 | pain relief 39 | pain relief 40 | pain relief 41 | pain relief 42 | pain relief 43 | pain relief 44 | pain relief 45 | pain relief 46 | pain relief 47 | pain relief 48 | pain relief 49 | pain relief 50 |
Secure Online Ordering FedEx Shipping